April 24, 2025
On 16 April 2025, the Supreme Court donned its legal robes and waded into the deep end of the gender pool with For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers. The judges made waves by ruling that under the Equality Act 2010, the terms “woman” and “sex” refer to biological sex – not gender identity – even for those with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).
In plain English: when it comes to single-sex spaces, the law now says you must go by biology, not identity. That means, for example, trans women may lawfully be excluded from women-only spaces, provided that there's justification to do so.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is now busy updating its code of conduct for services, following the judgment. However, business owners will now need to review their practices and consider whether any changes ought to be made to ensure that spaces and/or services provided to its personnel and/or the public, are appropriate in light of the ruling.
That said, there is not an automatic requirement on small businesses to make drastic changes – what might be expected of a huge business will not necessarily be considered reasonable for a small business. Nevertheless, business owners should be prepared for challenge. In reviewing your practices, therefore, it is important to carry out risk assessments and keep written records of decision-making, with justification for such decisions. It is also necessary to continue monitoring the spaces and services to ensure that as the business grows or changes, it also adapts its spaces and services to suit.
Whilst seen by many as a blow for the trans community, the judgment does not remove the protection afforded to transgender individuals under the Equality Act 2010.
The Equality Act protection covers employees, contract workers, partners and office holders during all stages of the employment relationship, including in relation to recruitment, terms and conditions, promotions, transfers, dismissals, and training. Discrimination can take various forms – not all as obvious as others. In a nutshell, these are:
Some roles may require a person not to be trans (occupational requirement) – but this is the rare exception, not the rule. When in doubt, check before you exclude.
If an employee discriminates against or harasses another, the employer is liable unless it has taken reasonable steps to prevent that conduct from taking place. It’s therefore imperative that employers continue to actively seek to prevent any discrimination against transgender individuals and take appropriate action against those who may step over the line.
Think about:
While the Supreme Court's decision provides clarity on the legal definitions of "woman" and "sex," it does not diminish the protections afforded to trans individuals under the Equality Act 2010. Employers must continue to uphold these protections, fostering an inclusive and respectful workplace for all employees.
A legal minefield? Potentially. However, approaching it in the right way and creating an inclusive and respectful workplace will go a long way to preventing challenges and claims.
If you require any help or assistance regards this topic or anything else employment law related, please contact our Employment Law Team.
For legal advice on employment law
Get in touchAs an employer who likes to keep their finger on the pulse when it comes to Employment Law, you are likely to have heard about the Vento guidelines....
No, we aren’t talking about the festive season but, instead, Easter! It’s just around the corner and it is of course one of the few days in the year...